Ihre Suchanfrage wird bearbeitet.
Please wait for a moment.
Archive Kerntechnik - Issue 2012/02 Back to overview
Delayed equilibrium model and validation experiments for two-phase choked flows relevant to LOCA
This paper deals with the 1-D Delayed Equilibrium Model (DEM) for choked or critical flow rate in steady state or quasisteady state conditions and the selection of the relevant experimental data for assessing such models. In particular, the focus is made on thermodynamic non-equilibrium conditions, which prevail in the flashing process near the critical section. In this regard, relaxation models such as the DEM developed and tested in previous studies at UCL was revisited and improved in view of their implementation in the next CATHARE code generation during the EU NURISP (NUclear Reactor Integrated Software Platform) project. A methodology to implement the DEM into is developed. Some new results of the DEM are compared against experimental data such as Super Moby-Dick experiments done in CEA and the well-known Marviken experiments performed at quasi-real scale geometry of Nuclear Plant.

From Y. Bartosiewicz | J.-M. Seynhaeve | G. Serre
(Received 06.12.2011)
Appeared in Kerntechnik 2012/02, Page 108-114
Direct link: http://www.nuclear-engineering-journal.com/KT110239
Pay content
References
+/-
1 Shapiro, H.: The dynamics and thermodynamics of compressible fluid flow. Vol. II, Ronald Press, New-York, USA, 1954.
2 Trapp, J. A.; Ransom, V. H.: A Choked-Flow Calculation Criterion from Nonhomeneous, Nonequilibrium, Two-Phase Flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 8 (1982) 669–681.
3 Bouré, J.; Fritte, A. A.; Giot, M.; Réocreux, M.: Highlights of Two-Phase Critical Flow: on the Links between Maximum Flow Rates, Sonic Velocities, Propagation and Transfer phenomena in Single and Two-Phase Flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 3 (1976) 1–22.
4 Aksan, N.; D’Auria, F.; Glaeser, H.; Pochard, R.; Richards, C. Sjoberg, A.: OECD/NEA-CSNI Separate Effects Test Matrix for Thermal-Hydraulic Code Validation, Volume I – Phenomena Characterisation and Selection of Facilities and Tests. Report NEA/CSNI/R(93)14/PARTI/REV (1994).
5 Attou, A.; Seynhaeve, J. M.: Steady-State Critical Two-Phase Flashing Flow with Possible Multiple Choking Phenomenon. Part 1: Physical Modeling and Numerical Procedure. J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 12 (1999) 335–345.
6 Lackmé, C.: Incompleteness of the Flashing of Supersaturated Liquid and Sonic Ejection of the Produced Phases. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 5 (1979) 131–141.
7 Féburie, V.; Giot, M.; Granger, S.; Seynhaeve, J. M.: A Model for Choked Flow Through Cracks with Inlet Subcooling. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 19 (1993) 541–562.
8 Downar-Zapolski, P.; Bilicki, Z.; Bolle, L.; Franco, J.: The Non-Equilibrium Relaxation Model for One-Dimensional Flashing Liquid Flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22 (1996) 473–483.
9 Bilicki, Z.; Kestin, J.: Physical Aspects of the Relaxation Model in Two-Phase Flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A428 (1990) 379–397.
10 Tiselj, I.; Horvat, A.; Cerne, G.; Gale, J.; Parzer, I.; Mavko, B.; Giot, M.; Seynhaeve, J. M.; Kucienska, B.; Lemonnier, H.: WAHA3 Code Manual. Jožef Stefan Institute Report, IJS-DP-8841 2004.
11 Tiselj, I.; Petelin, S.: Modeling of Two-Phase Flow with Second Order Accurate Scheme., J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 503–521.
12 Barna, I. F.; Imre, A. R.; Baranyal, G.; Ezsöl, G.: Experimental and Theoretical Study of Steam Condensation Induced Water Hammer Phenomena. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240 (2010) 146–150.
13 Kuscienska, B.; Seynhaeve, J. M.; Giot, M.: Friction Relaxation Model for Fast Transient Flows – Application toWater Hammer in Two-Phase Flow – The WAHA code. Proceeding of 5th International Symposium on Multiphase Flow, Heat Mass Transfer and Energy Conversion, Xi’an, China, 2005, 3–6 July.
14 Réocreux, M.: Contribution à l’étude des débits critiques en écoulement diphasique eau-vapeur. PhD thesis, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 1974.
15 Rousseau, C. J.: Flashing flow, Experimental data sets for evaluation of modeling methods (HEWITT G. F. Harwell Laboratory) – Data set No 13, 1986.
16 Rousseau, C. J.: Flashing Flow. Multiphase Science and Technology 3 (1987) 378–389.
17 The Marviken full scale critical flow tests. Joint Reactor Safety Experiments in the Marviken Power Station in Sweden, Third seriesconclusions, NEA report MXC-402, 1979, December.
18 Attou, A.; Bolle, L.; Franco, J.; Seynhaeve, J.M.: Flow through Singularities and Ducts Downstream of Safety Valves, Towards a Better Design of Pressure Relief System in Chemical and Petroteum Industries. Environment program E. U., UCL-TERM contribution, 1996.
19 Bolle, L.; Downar-Zapolski, P.; Franco, J.; Seynhaeve J. M.: Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Flashing Water Flow through a Safety Valve. Journal of Hazardous Materials 46 (1996) 105–116.
20 Sozzi, G. L. Sutherland, W. A.: Critical flow of saturated and subcooled water at high pressure. Core and safety development NEDO-13418, Nuclear Energy Division, General Electric Company, California, USA, 1975.
21 Sozzi, G. L. Sutherland, W. A.: Critical Flow of Saturated and Subcooled Water at High Pressure. Proceedings of ASME Symp. of Non-Equilibrium Two-phase Flows, 1975, 19–25.
22 Véneau, T.: Etude expérimentale et modélisation de la décompression d’un réservoir de stockage de propane. PhD thesis – Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, France, 1995.
23 Emonot, P.; Souyri, A.; Gandrille, J. L.; Barré, F.: CATHARE 3: A New System Code for Thermal-Hydraulic in the Context of the NEPTUNE Project. Proceedings of NURETH13, Kanazawa, Japan 2009.
© 2013 by Carl Hanser Verlag
Navigation
Document number